HOME

Feb 4, 2008

Microsoft and Yahoo combined...

Article by Tess.

Yahoo was 3-4 years ahead of Google and was once number one. We all know what happened later, Google became an institution bigger than all the major search engines together and with their new technology and their huge resources it is impossible for any competition to beat them (?).

Nothing is better for you and me than serious competition for our ad dollars. I would love for Yahoo Search Marketing to be a formidable opponent to Google but I don't think it's possible. Microsoft and Yahoo becoming one will likely not achieve anything other than they'll just argue with each other about how to mis-spell everything.

Google had no plan whatsoever to start an independent company but they were more or less forced to do it since no of the major search engines where interested in taking on their ideas. Relativley speaking the guys had to work on a shoe string budget and were forced to build a technology platform that was very cheap. They didn't have oracle databases or expensive servers and all that, they had to go to the spare part room to put togther whatever they could find and work from there. In contrast, Yahoo spent millions trying to come up with something new and yet their pay-per-click system is yet the most pathetic thing I have ever seen. And I am being kind.

Don't get me wrong here, I am a bit Google paranoid myself and I don't like to put all my eggs in one basket but I really wish that Yahoo and their eqvivalents could come up with something worth the while, something simple to use.

My point is that Google had to work with very limited resources and Yahoo and Microsoft has all theses assets and they cant even get out of their own way. At the end of the day it is the quality of the business idea and the quality of the commitment that makes the difference. It is not about how much money you have; you can start off with very limited resources and become number one, Google is the living proof of that.

Yahoo has a system that auctions keywords to the max bidder while Google's system is based on maximum revenue per 1000 impressions. So if you take Googles click-through rate formula your position is your bid price times your click-through rate. That way you get a cost per impression. Google make money on the advertisers that makes them the most money per search. That translates to something like 30-40% improvement in revenue per search over what Yahoo gets.
In other words Yahoo is loosing money in every single search and of course those who syndicate yahoo ads on their website make less money on every impression too. Then the advertisers make less money which makes them be less interested in using Yahoo services for promoting and that causes a downwards spiral.

If we flip it around the other way you have all the Google Adword users who are split testing and scratching looser ads, try to beat their winner ads and peel out keywords that aren't doing too well and insert and regroup keyword that are doing well. Everytime they do that they are doing a win-win-win and it's an upwards spiral where things get better and better. So by every passing month of improvements like this it will get easier for people to find what they are looking for.

Google never made any big mistakes really, sure there were some miscalculations with Froogle and some other projects but overall they have done everything right and now they are unstoppable. The mistakes Yahoo and Microsoft has made in the past are numerous. I seriously think the two giants working together is another big mistake but I hope I am wrong.
 

 

 

 
 
©2007 URONLINEBIZ.COM. All right reserved.